Mindless Thoughts

          Why do we have to argue about an opinion even we say we are entitled to have an opinion it ironic to think we do have a right to have an opinion when there's someone there to try to oppose your opinion. Though it hardly ends in a good way or it does not even have an ending because a person "I am entitled to my opinion." Which ends the whole argument to begin with and both people ended up nowhere because of that statement.       Arguing an opinion gives up the right to even have an opinion because both have an opinion, but both can't settle with each others opinion. So, if we give up the right that we are entitled to our own opinions we can as a group search for the truth because if we all work together we can go much further than having to settle with one idea.     Someone can have an opinion, but having one and then expressing them to someone else that has an opposite opinion "one of them must be suffering a rights violat...

 My response to this after we discussed it in class and had further details and ideas on this topic is that we could say that we do have our right to our opinion, but actually we don't since our opinion are always wrong because there will be something prove you wrong. So if an opinion causes an argument between two people instead of arguing who's right or wrong, you instead should find out the real truth. Since opinions are never right like what the shape of the earth is argument since there really can't be an opinion on what is the actual shape of the earth because the shape is definite cause it isn't a triangle, flat, or a cube because there is no other shape the earth can be than a sphere-like shape. So, opinions are used or are like a method to bring 2 or more people together to see the real truth. Most people can say they hate the taste of chocolate, but they really mean is they aren't a fan of chocolate though they know the difference between tasteful and dist...

  My first impression on "The Right To Your Opinion" is that I do see someone try to change someone else's opinion by saying their own opinion and making it seem that theirs is right rather than their own. I think this only happens when their own thoughts or their inner self is being threatened in some way. So when someone goes against their opinion they try to stand up for it and have a debate though the debate has no winner most of the time. So what the article is trying to say is that you can be "entitled" to an opinion, but only if you don't share the opinion because once your opinion goes against another person's opinion you'll have a debate of who's right or wrong, but neither could be wrong or right so it's a debate that ends up in a draw.